{"id":347,"date":"2010-11-04T01:32:30","date_gmt":"2010-11-03T17:32:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/?p=347"},"modified":"2011-12-12T01:15:42","modified_gmt":"2011-12-11T17:15:42","slug":"hektar-reit-q3-2010-results-accounting-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/hektar-reit-q3-2010-results-accounting-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Hektar REIT Q3 2010 results &#038; accounting review"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hektar Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) announced its <a href=\"http:\/\/announcements.bursamalaysia.com\/EDMS\/edmsweb.nsf\/LsvAllByID\/E7BD6B1A4428DEC9482577D0003130F2?OpenDocument\" target=\"_blank\">Q3 2010 results<\/a> yesterday, with some extracts below:<\/p>\n<table border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"216\"><strong>Cumulative 3 Quarters<\/strong><\/td>\n<td width=\"85\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Current<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"85\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Preceding<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"64\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>YTD<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>YTD<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>30.9.2010<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>30.9.2009<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>%<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Revenue<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Actual revenue &#8211; billing<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\">66,837,205<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\">66,182,580<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\">1.0%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Revenue under FRS 117<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\">1,059,693<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\">&#8211;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\">100%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Total revenue<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\"><strong>67,896,898 <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\"><strong>66,182,580<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\">2.6%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td>\u00a0<!--more--><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Trade receivables<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&#8211; actual billing<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\">706,621<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\">375,188<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\">88.3%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&#8211; receivables under FRS 117<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\">1,059,693<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\">&#8211;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\">100%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Total trade receivables<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\"><strong>1,766,314 <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\"><strong>375,188<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\">370.8%<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Liabilities<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Deferred income (FRS 139)<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\"><strong>1,058,904 <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>&#8211;<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>\n<p align=\"left\"><strong>Cash flow from operating activities<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Adjustment for non-cash item<\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>&#8211; Revenue under FRS 117<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\">(1,059,693)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\">&#8211;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<table style=\"width: 290pt; border-collapse: collapse;\" width=\"386\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<colgroup span=\"1\">\n<col style=\"width: 162pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 6912;\" span=\"1\" width=\"216\" \/>\n<col style=\"width: 64pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 2720;\" span=\"1\" width=\"85\" \/> <\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 12.75pt;\">\n<td class=\"xl26\" style=\"width: 226pt; height: 12.75pt; mso-ignore: colspan;\" colspan=\"2\" width=\"301\" height=\"17\"><\/td>\n<td class=\"xl25\" style=\"width: 64pt;\" width=\"85\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 12.75pt;\">\n<td class=\"xl24\" style=\"height: 12.75pt;\" height=\"17\"><\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\"><\/td>\n<td class=\"xl24\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 12.75pt;\">\n<td class=\"xl24\" style=\"height: 12.75pt;\" height=\"17\"><\/td>\n<td class=\"xl25\"><\/td>\n<td class=\"xl25\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div style=\"height: 0.1em; visibility: hidden;\">.<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Accounting policies disclosed in the Quarterly Report (QR):<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">A13 RENTAL INCOME FROM TENANCIES (FRS 117: Leases)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Rental income receivable under tenancy agreements is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Meanwhile, gross turnover rental is recognized as income in the accounting period on a receipt basis.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">A14 DEFERRED INCOME (FRS 139: Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Deferred income relates to the difference between consideration received for tenancy deposits and its fair value using the discounted cash flow method.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<table class=\"alignleft\" width=\"470\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"308\">Net present value at discounted cash flow<\/td>\n<td width=\"93\">\n<p align=\"right\">20,349,972<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Deferred income (FRS 139)<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\">1,058,904<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Gross tenancy deposits received<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\"><strong>21,408,876<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div style=\"height: 1.1em; visibility: hidden;\">.<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">The deferred income will be unwind and recognised as income in the income statement over the lease term.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Review of performance<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Actual revenue was higher than the preceding year\u2019s corresponding period by 2.6%. This is due to overall improvement in rentals and car park income in 2010. In addition, the <strong>application of FRS117 commencing 1 January 2010 also contributed to the higher revenue in 2010<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>What are the new accounting policies or treatment noted?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">The QR disclosed that the application of FRS 117 commencing 1 Jan 2010 has resulted in additional revenue of RM1,059,693, may due to the effect of difference on rental income receivable under tenancy agreements which is recognised on a straight-line basis over the term of lease, against the gross turnover rental recognised on a receipt basis.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/rental.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" style=\"display: inline; border: 0px;\" title=\"rental\" src=\"https:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/rental_thumb.png\" alt=\"rental\" width=\"215\" height=\"201\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>What is this about? <\/strong>It is more likely this is the effect of recognition of rental income which is chargable to tenants on a step-up basis over the lease term or there might be rent free period given at the initial lease term.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Why the effect only shown up in 2010 under FRS 117?<\/strong> Are amendments to FRS 117 which take effect from 1 Jan 2010 affect the recognition of rental income? Take a look at the <a href=\"http:\/\/masb.org.my\/images\/stories\/New_FRS\/ImprovementFRS117_15Sept09.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">MASB Amendments to FRS 117.<\/a> In fact, no amendments were made as to the recognition of rental income.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">In order to promote greater compliance to the approved accounting standards, Hektar REIT may take the opportunity under FRS 117 amendments to recognise the rental straight-line effect this year as revenue and trade receivables.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>Is this change constitutes a change in accounting policy which may require retrospective application?<\/strong> It may not be the case. It may just a change in presentation and disclosure. Or no retrospective application is necessary may due to its immaterial effect.<\/p>\n<table class=\"alignleft\" width=\"496\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"436\"><\/td>\n<td width=\"81\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>After<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"84\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>Before<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"436\">Market value of investment properties, say<\/td>\n<td width=\"81\">\n<p align=\"right\">10,000,000<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"84\">\n<p align=\"right\">10,000,000<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"436\">(already take into consideration of rent free period and step up rental)<\/td>\n<td width=\"81\"><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"436\"><\/td>\n<td width=\"81\"><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"436\">Less: effect of straight-line rental income recognised as trade receivable<\/td>\n<td width=\"81\">\n<p align=\"right\">(1,059,693)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"center\">&#8211;<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"436\"><\/td>\n<td width=\"81\"><\/td>\n<td><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"436\">Fair value of investment properties carried in the book<\/td>\n<td width=\"81\">\n<p align=\"right\"><strong>8,940,307 <\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td>\n<p align=\"right\"><strong>10,000,000<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<table class=\"alignleft\" width=\"496\" border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"270\"><\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p align=\"right\"><strong>30.9.2010<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"93\">\n<p align=\"right\"><strong>30.9.2009<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"270\">Investment Properties<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p align=\"right\">715,972,878<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"93\">\n<p align=\"right\">720,000,000<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div style=\"height: 0.1em; visibility: hidden;\">.<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">The reduction in investment properties may have been effected the amount of trade receivables as a separate current asset item.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hektar Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) announced its Q3 2010 results yesterday, with some extracts below: Cumulative 3 Quarters Current Preceding \u00a0 \u00a0 YTD YTD \u00a0 \u00a0 30.9.2010 30.9.2009 % Revenue Actual revenue &#8211; billing 66,837,205 66,182,580 1.0% Revenue under FRS 117 1,059,693 &#8211; 100% Total revenue 67,896,898 66,182,580 2.6% \u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[80],"tags":[9,20],"class_list":["post-347","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-financial-reporting","tag-accounting","tag-reit"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=347"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/347\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=347"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=347"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nbc.com.my\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=347"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}